sadrazam


1864 yılında Kahire ’de doğdu. Kavalalı Mehmed Ali Paşa ’nın torunu ve vezir Halim Paşa ’nın oğludur.

Kucuk yaşta ailesiyle birlikte İstanbul ’a geldi. Ozel tahsil gordu. Kardeşi Abbas Halim ile birlikte İsvicre ’de siyasî ilimler dalında yuksek tahsil yaptı. Donduğunde (1888) ŞûrÂ-yı Devlet AzÂsı tÂyin edildi. Muhtelif nişanlarla taltif olunup “Rumeli Beylerbeyliği” payesine erişti (1900). Kardeşi ile birlikte Mısır ’a gonderildi. Meşrutiyet ’in ilanı uzerine İstanbul ’a dondu.

Once ŞûrÂ-yı Devlet Reisi (1912), Mahmud Şevket Paşa ’nın sadrazamlığında Hariciye Nazırı (1913) ve onun olumunden sonra sadrazam oldu (1913). Balkan Harbi ’nin sonu ile Birinci Dunya Harbi ’nin ilk yıllarında sadrazam olarak kaldı. Osmanlı Devleti ’nin harbe katılmaması icin gosterdiği gayretler fayda vermedi.

İttihatcıların, elindeki yetkileri yavaş yavaş almaları neticesinde, once uzerinde bulunan hariciye nazırlığını, sonra da sadrazamlığı bıraktı (Şubat 1917).

Mutareke ’de yurt dışına kacmayı reddetti. Harp suclusu olarak yargılanması icin kendisi muracaat etti. İstanbul ’un işgalinden sonra 10 Mart 1919 ’da tutuklandı.

22 Mayıs ’ta İngilizler tarafından, oteki siyasi mahkumlarla birlikte Malta adasına suruldu. Burada iki yıl kadar kaldıktan sonra 29 Nisan 1921 ’de bırakıldı.

Arapca, Farsca, İngilizce ve Fransızca biliyordu. İstanbul ’a kabul edilmediği icin Roma ’da oturdu.

6 Aralık 1921 tarihinde bir Ermeni tarafından şehit edildi.

ESERİ:

Buhranlarımız



HAKKINDA YAZILANLAR

Bir İslamcı Duşunur Said Halim Paşa
M.Hanefi Bostan
İrfan Yayınları

... Bu araştırmada Said Halim Paşa'nın hayatı ve eserleri ele alınmakla kalmayıp, yer yer devrin siyasi olaylarına da değinildi. Siyasi olayların incelenmesinde Paşa'nın soz ve yazılarına da yer verildi.

Elinizdeki eserin, unutulmuş ve yanlış tanıtılmış şahsiyetleri gercek yonleriyle ortaya koymak ve ayrıca donemin tarihi hadiselerinin de gercek yuzunu meydana cıkarmak acısından buyuk bir boşluğu dolduracağı inancındayız.


ENGLISH BIOGRAPHY

Mehmet Sait Halim was born on 19 February 1864 in Cairo. His grandfather was Mehmet Ali Paşa, a viceroy of Egypt who had rebelled against the Sultan. He came to Istanbul with his family when he was 6 years old. He learned Arabic, Persian, French, English and he studied political science in Switzerland. Upon his return to Istanbul he became a member of the State Council in 1888 and he was appointed as the governor of Rumeli in 1890.

Sultan Abdulhamid sent Sait Halim to exile, when it was found out that he had links with the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP). He first went to Egypt and then moved to Europe where he had contact with the CUP for which he was also providing financial assistance.

Sait Halim returned to Istanbul when the constitutional rule was proclaimed in 1908. Four years later he became the chairman of the State Council. He left this post after a government change, but only to be reinstalled again when Mahmut Şevket Paşa became Grand Vizier. He also had a place in the cabinet, as the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

When Mahmut Şevket Paşa was assassinated, the CUP asked him to become the Grand Vizier, he accepted it, although the Sultan was against this appointment. In this capacity, he negotiated peace conditions with the Balkan nations.

It is still a question, whether Sait Halim Paşa approved Turkey ’s entry to the World War or even whether he was informed about it in advance. The fact is that during the course of the war, he diverged from the CUP leaders. He resigned on 3 February 1917.

After the armistice, the military tribunal found him guilty and Sait Halim Paşa was sent to exile in Malta. He was released on 29 April 1921 and he crossed to Sicily. From there, he wanted to return to Istanbul but he did not manage to obtain the approval of Ankara government.

On 6 December 1921, he was assasinated by an Armenian gunman in front of his apartment in Rome. His remains were brought to Istanbul and buried at the Tomb of Sultan Mahmut.

Sait Halim Paşa was not only a politician, but also a leading thinker of his time and an opponent of the ideology of modernization. He was not against the Ottoman-Islamic modernization itself, but he was opposing its content and direction. He thought that it was wrong for reform movements to ignore the interactions between religious, political, social and cultural spheres, which can affect different societies with different backgrounds in different ways. For him it was wrong to imitate the Western progress as it is..